Logo

Is it socially acceptable for individuals to wear clothing typically associated with the opposite gender? What are some reasons for or against this practice?

Last Updated: 21.06.2025 09:14

Is it socially acceptable for individuals to wear clothing typically associated with the opposite gender? What are some reasons for or against this practice?

3) Fetish crossdressers - who use clothes as a substitute for, or an essential precursor to, sex. This is commonest among teenage boys, but usually disappears or develops into transvestism later. It is rarely seen in public, although the word "fetish" is often misapplied by those who should know better.

c) Drag queens and Drag kings – an exaggerated satirical sub-section of the light entertainment field.

d) Stunt doubles.

Proposed NASA radio probe could use gravity 'lumpiness' to reveal the insides of alien worlds - Space

Reasons against it? Basically,

Socially acceptable? It depends on which bit of society you live in.

Don’t do it in places where it’s illegal, like Russia.

150-Million-Year-Old Stegosaurus Skull Rewrites Dinosaur Evolution - SciTechDaily

If you’re going to do it, do it 100% and do it well. You’ll enjoy it all the more and so will the people around you. It’s often good for a round of applause or a free drink.

4) Entertainers.

Don’t do it unless you want to.

Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List - MLB Trade Rumors

Ignore people who will quote their religion at you (unless it’s your religion too).

a) In serious entertainment, actors playing a role. From Mark Rylance as Cleopatra or Judi Dench as Olivia to Antony Perkins in Psycho. Japanese Kabuki and Nō players. Sopranos singing "breeches" roles in opera.

If it’s merely your sexual fetish — see 3) above — don’t do it in public. You’ll look ridiculous and possible offend decency laws.

Infamous 'neutron lifetime puzzle' may finally have a solution — but it involves invisible atoms - Live Science

There are many reasons. This can be broken down into the eight broad categories below, though most people only think of no.6:

2) Fashion crossdressers - some metrosexuals and most women fall into this category. Women in trousers – seen as a sexual and social aberration in 1900 – had become the norm by 2000.

6) Transvestites – what most people first think of. For transvestites, crossdressing is an end in itself; motives many and various. For most, these go back to childhood or before birth and are obsessive.

Your Apple Watch Is Getting a Neat New Feature That You’ll Actually Use - Gear Patrol

1) Occasional crossdressers - Hallowe'en, practical jokers, fancy dress parties, students' rags... etc.

In Lancaster County, Pennsylvania or Salt Lake City it won’t be accepted. In Rio or Douarnenez at Mardi Gras it’s practically compulsory. (Seriously, I counted the men in skirts in a bar in Douarnenez: one in six.)

5) Other professionals: the occasional spy/undercover policeman/criminal in disguise. Gay prostitutes.

How to see Mars visit a bright star and the moon this June - Space

b) In light entertainment: female impersonators/comedians; pantomime dames in British theatre.

7) Transsexuals – for many of them the cross-dressing is merely an incidental stage in their transition of identity. Once achieved, the wearing of the clothes of the other sex becomes the norm, and can no longer be called crossdressing.

8) Those forced into crossdressing. This category is included for completeness but barely seems to exist in real life today. It was however observed in the period 1850-1950 when boys were occasionally forced into girls' clothes as a punishment at school or in the home. It is a staple of fiction – to escape from danger (Some Like It Hot), to obtain a job (Tootsie, Mrs Doubtfire), or forced by a sadistic female relative (much transvestite erotic fiction).

Why is the internet so restrictive? Why is it impossible to find a place where you can express yourself fully?